Skip to content
AAA.win

Chinese App Review Pain Point Summary

Can the agent summarize messy Chinese app reviews without inventing pain points?

中文Writinghallucinated_issue
Preview evidencemaa-preview-002

Full task input

Extract pain points, counts, severity, representative comments, and three product suggestions.

Scoring rubric

Must merge similar issues, count accurately, cite evidence, and avoid unsupported suggestions.
Primary risk
hallucinated_issue
Temperature
0.2
Tools
Disabled
Web browsing
Disabled
Memory
Disabled

Agent prompt summary

Extract pain points, counts, severity, representative comments, and three product suggestions.

Rubric summary

Must merge similar issues, count accurately, cite evidence, and avoid unsupported suggestions.

Task leaderboard

Kimi Main920% critical
OpenAI Main890% critical
Qwen Main850% critical
GLM Main850% critical
Doubao Main850% critical
Claude Main830% critical
MiniMax Main830% critical
Gemini Main800% critical
Perplexity Main800% critical
ERNIE Main800% critical
Hunyuan Main800% critical
Yi Main800% critical
DeepSeek Main7933% critical
Llama Main790% critical
Mistral Main790% critical
Grok Main7733% critical
Cohere Main770% critical
Phi Main750% critical

Common failure tags

unsupported_claimliteral_translationhallucinated_issueweak_ctatoo_verboseunsafe_refund_promise

Sample outputs and scoring notes

Kimi Main currently leads this task. When reading samples, focus on task completion, whether the output respects business boundaries such as hallucinated_issue, and whether the structure can move into a workflow. The most visible failure tag is unsupported_claim.

OpenAI Main

maa-preview-002.chinese-app-review-pain-points.openai-main.02

Preview
Batch: maa-preview-002Model version: Not measuredTemperature: 0.2Cost: $0.0245Latency: Not measuredHuman review: Not reviewed

Raw output (untruncated)

Preview seed output. Replace with exact model output for real evaluations.
Valid JSONRequired fields presentNo critical failure
Run score100
task success
5/5
language fit
5/5
instruction following
5/5
business safety
5/5
output reliability
5/5

Review note: Synthetic preview score generated from deterministic seed data.

Grok Main

maa-preview-002.chinese-app-review-pain-points.grok-main.03

Preview
Batch: maa-preview-002Model version: Not measuredTemperature: 0.2Cost: $0.0121Latency: Not measuredHuman review: Not reviewed

Raw output (untruncated)

Preview seed output. Replace with exact model output for real evaluations.
Valid JSONRequired fields presentCritical failure
hallucinated_issueunsafe_refund_promise
Run score72
task success
4/5
language fit
4/5
instruction following
4/5
business safety
3/5
output reliability
3/5

Review note: Synthetic preview score generated from deterministic seed data.

Downloads use the same run objects as this page.

Version · v4.3.6-indexnow-delivery-verified

Latest releases

IndexNow production delivery verification

Verified production IndexNow receipt with a new key: Microsoft's external proof returned HTTP 200, single-URL GET and POST both returned HTTP 200, and eight batches covering 386 canonical URLs each returned HTTP 200 with zero retries. A second run found the inventory unchanged and sent no request.

IndexNow proof-origin protocol fix

Production Bing validation exposed HTTP 500 at the external root proof because TLS termination was followed by an internal rewrite using the wrong protocol. This release corrects that rewrite boundary, but remains unverified until the external proof returns HTTP 200, the automatic submission runs, a later canary returns HTTP 200, and the idempotent rerun passes.

IndexNow root-proof request compatibility

After v4.3.3, the exact root-level {key}.txt proof returned HTTP 200, but a full request carrying keyLocation still returned HTTP 403; a minimal homepage request with the same production key and no keyLocation returned HTTP 202. This release omits that field, while the automatic full run and idempotent rerun remain deployment checks.

View all releases